Once again, even though I am a proud member of ‘Patriots Soapbox’, I write this of my own accord and not representative of the YouTube Patriots Soapbox group. I also have no degrees or formal training. I present this as an amateur researcher only. Keep in mind the examples given in this presentation are amateur observations and the conclusions discussed are also from a ley perspective. To watch the clips in YouTube, be sure to add the appropriate YouTube prefix.
Mika Brzezinski, during a conversation on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” on 22 February 2017, let slip a telling phrase “He (President Trump) can exactly control what people think. That’s our job.” She later damaged control in a subsequent tweet citing the pressures of the media in the age of someone who has as much disdain for the media as the president does.
watch?v=quU_Tbv96Wk
However, this wasn’t the first time someone let loose the role of the media. A quick scan of YouTube, typing in “The role of the news media” can give you results from Noam Chomsky to Tony Blair. Overwhelmingly, they seem to push an agenda they feel will move the world forward to a globalist utopia.
We know, however, that their words, while seemingly kind and positive on the surface, hold a deep and sinister undertone that becomes obvious when you recognize the assault that is placed on the viewer.
If you recall from my earlier post, the mind assumes the state of low-frequency alpha waves almost bordering on the delta band. In this state, the mind’s higher brain reasoning is compromised, and while you know of what is being said, your ability to filter out things not agreeable to your normal acuity and intelligence.
EXAMPLE 1: MSNBC Morning Joe—9 November 2016—In the thirteen minute clip, both the hosts and the analysts on air were stunned, almost congratulatory in their analysis. This is before anyone of the establishment got to the media. This was hours after the polls closed and declared Donald Trump the winner. Note the body language, almost as if they just emerged as the loser of a street fight. Joe’s body language is more closed, his hands never leave his personal space. He is projecting defeat. Mika is dead quiet as she assumes a submissive role except for an almost puzzled sounding question around 2 minutes 30. She is wearing black as if dressed for a funeral.
watch?v=VgYph OJ7qiw
EXAMPLE 2: MSNBC Morning Joe—10 November 2016 — I want you to compare and contrast this clip which aired 24 hours later. Joe is more animated as is Mika. He goes after the press in an ‘I told you so’ manner. His body language is more forward, even as he holds the paper in front of him. The entire segment is about how the media got it wrong. He is accusatory, and he points at the camera. His brow is more furrowed, and while still conciliatory, his voice inflections are raised, as if a parent were scolding a child. What is remarkable here is the establishment, still in shock, is not masking this reality. Mika reads a small letter from filmmaker Michael Moore at the 10 minute mark about the postmortem of the election, and while she is now dressed in a more neutral gray, she still has a black top on underneath… still projecting a defeated attitude despite more participation in the segment.
watch?v=zY3nRgEZTm8
Note that in both examples, a narrative has not been crafted yet, at least for this program, while on other shows on the same network, a more resistant tone is forming. In both clips, however, I want you to notice how NLP and NAC worked against the news media. We know the media was mocking Trump supporters, and only a few analysts were giving Trump a chance to win. We know this, and this is old news. However, a large majority of what the news media endured resulted from their own doing. The constant echo chamber that formed inside the major news media lent itself to a complacent attitude that seeped into the liberal party politic.
EXAMPLE 3: MSNBC Rachel Maddow—10 August 2016—The guest host for the evening, Steve Kornacki, goes through a segment where the vote turned out as electoral landslides. He qualifies such a victory as forty states and over four hundred electoral votes. His delivery is sharp and his facts are flying out of his mouth like darts to a board. He can’t wait to get to the part of the segment where he compares historical figures with current poll projections. The hands are full of motions, he brings up the Reagan Mondale blowout of 1984, even pulling Tom Brokaw’s coverage (an authority figure by journalistic standards then) to make his point. He runs through the possibilities at the touch screen and poll numbers like a child at Christmas.
watch?v=zerWCVpXTr8
NLP and NAC isn’t just about associating things and verbal language. It is about the anatomical cues projected to the viewer. If someone is invested enough in the outcome of a particular event, the visuals are impossible to hide. By extension, if you are part of the news media, you have studied psychology at some point either in school or as an adjunct course during your training.
If you remember the example I brought up earlier in the series where Roger Stone struck PamphletAnon on the back, I said Roger attempted to do two things. He tried to associate the slap with an immediate negative rant against Jeff Sessions and disrupting the victim’s thought process by executing the maneuver. A disrupted mind means the patterns of thought are disrupted, and the ability to implant a new thought process is easier.
EXAMPLE 4: CNN STATE OF THE UNION—22 April 2018—In this segment between anchor Dana Bash and Trump Spokeswoman Kelly Ann Conway. You witness Dana read from a prepared litany of questions, starting first with the possibility of Trump’s personal lawyer Cohen flipping on Trump. When Conway gives a short answer and tries to divert the conversation to his accomplishment, Bash brings it back to a different Trump-negative, seeing that a circular conversation would be counter-intuitive. You now see the disruption method forming. You can see the camera positioned as two combatants across a table. (You will note that media allies and anchors are more seated side by side to generate a sense of sympathy. If the friendly parties are sitting across from each other, the anchor leans forward to show cohesion.)
watch?v=ZJs7DoAVQbk
By the end of the interview, Bash disrupts the conversation so much that Conway can not finish a cohesive thought. Dana attempts to show the audience Kelly Ann’s incompetence by not allowing her to counter concerning her spouse’s disagreement, signaling a division in her marriage. However, Kelly Ann, wise to the tactics of her adversary, does not allow Dana to latch on. Every time the interviewer redirects, she points out the tactics, forcing Dana to take the submissive role towards the finish (deflection tactic).
Often, interviewers in the combative position knowingly ask questions that their guests can not answer to get them off balance.
EXAMPLE 5: CNN THE LEAD—22 Dec 2017–In this clip, we see Jake Tapper question a representative of Judge Roy Moore’s senate team, knowing he is a devout Christian and swore his allegiance on a Christian Bible. Jake leads his guest to where he knows he can trap him in the nuance where he states “You know you don’t need a Christian Bible to take an oath of office.” After that, Ted Crockett is caught flat footed for the rest of the conversation, and Jake assumes a dominant position.
watch?v=hqEA03v3OtQ
Rapport between viewer and anchor if he or she can assume dominance over the situation. Once again, this is a form of NLP. If you can either associate a positive alpha role to yourself while simultaneously giving the desired individual a negative beta role, you associate positive feelings with the anchor and his series of posers and negativity towards the defeated target’s cause or idea.
One final word that should be obvious. The modern news media, outside Fox News to a large degree, has learned a lot from Josef Goebbels. If you repeat something often, no matter how erroneous, it becomes a reality.
So, Putin is bad, Russia is bad, Russia interferes in the US Election, Trump is Elected, Trump likes Putin, Trump likes Russia, therefore Trump is Putin, and Trump is Bad
It does not matter whether this is true. The subconscious has no truth filter. If it’s repeated long enough, it is linked to truth in the subconscious and therefore the thoughts generated from that subconscious, whether grounded by fact or set by fictitious craft, becomes a reality if the subject is inundated with the applied narrative.
<PROLOGUE END> CHAPTER 1 BEGINS 12 June 2018 23:59 GMT
CheckmateQuake 